Subject: Re: newvers.sh padding problem
To: matthew green <email@example.com>
From: Perry E. Metzger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/01/1999 12:16:43
matthew green <email@example.com> writes:
> This begs the question of why we are still using an SCCS-style tag in
> vers.c. It's kind of silly to use SCCS syntax for this, given that
> ~nothing else we maintain uses SCCS (other than historical BSD
> copyright notices).
> this user will be very upset the day NetBSD says "what /netbsd"
> does not work.
We could do the RCS equivalent pretty easily.