Subject: Re: newvers.sh padding problem
To: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
From: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 02/01/1999 12:16:43
matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> writes:
>    This begs the question of why we are still using an SCCS-style tag in
>    vers.c.  It's kind of silly to use SCCS syntax for this, given that
>    ~nothing else we maintain uses SCCS (other than historical BSD
>    copyright notices).
> 
> this user will be very upset the day NetBSD says "what /netbsd"
> does not work.

We could do the RCS equivalent pretty easily.