On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Curt Sampson wrote:

: > 1) we now use .lo for "local" objects, obj files to be run on the host,
: > not the target. Should we change the crunchide object names from .lo to
: > something else? .co maybe?
: 
: .lo is a rather bad name to use for `local objects,' since it's already
: used by libutil for `library objects'.

It doesn't matter what we use it for in our local tree with pmake
makefiles.  This was discussed at length, but apparently the crunch stuff
wasn't noticed (and apparently already used `.lo').

-- 
-- Todd Vierling (Personal tv@pobox.com; Bus. todd_vierling@xn.xerox.com)