On Sat, 12 Sep 1998, Bill Studenmund wrote:

> 1) we now use .lo for "local" objects, obj files to be run on the host,
> not the target. Should we change the crunchide object names from .lo to
> something else? .co maybe?

.lo is a rather bad name to use for `local objects,' since it's already
used by libutil for `library objects'.

cjs

Curt Sampson    cjs@portal.ca	   Info at http://www.portal.ca/
Internet Portal Services, Inc.	   Through infinite mist, software reverberates
Vancouver, BC  (604) 257-9400	   In code possess'd of invisible folly.