Subject: Re: HOST_PROG ?
To: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/14/1997 12:32:08
On Sat, 13 Dec 1997 15:23:24 -0800 (PST)
Bill Studenmund <email@example.com> wrote:
> I'm trying to set things up to cross-compile the whole NetBSD source tree.
> I have the tools working, but now I'm running into problems with the code.
> The main one right now is that the tn3270 code seems to want to run a lot
> of tools on the compiling computer. But it wants to use the standard CC,
> which is the cross cc. Bad things happen. :-(
> So for now, I'm going to hack up the Makefiles (my local ones :-) to use
> HOST_CC & friends. But would it make sense to add a HOST_PROG and HOST_SRC
> targets to bsd.prog.mk? I think doing such a thing successfuly is a bit
> beyond me at the moment. ;-( Though it seems a cleaner solution.
I thought about doing something like athat at one point. The real problem
is that you need different .c.o rules, etc. So, the existing bsd.*.mk
file structure won't do HOST_PROG properly.
Jason R. Thorpe firstname.lastname@example.org
NASA Ames Research Center Home: +1 408 866 1912
NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: +1 650 604 0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: +1 415 428 6939