Subject: Re: Avoiding microtime(9) global state
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/30/2004 18:11:25
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Jun 30, 2004, at 2:16 PM, email@example.com wrote:
> And example is:
> A given file system operation might want to be tagged with a
> 'time' for global ordering (i.e., so that if time changes,
> operation is not considered to have occured before another
> operation when sorting/batching i/o).
> The same file system operation might want to mark a file with
> current Time of Day (e.g., modify time).
> I suspect that trying to use an actual time value and forcing it to
> always increase was an attempt to shoehorn both of those together.
So, perhaps there should be mono_microtime() (for the former), and
plain-old microtime() for the latter.
...and have fun auditing all the microtime() calls to determine which
ones should be changed to mono_microtime() :-)
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453;
content-description: This is a digitally signed message part
content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----