tech-security archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH] fexecve



On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:45:02 +0000
David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:52:30PM +0000, Julian Yon wrote:
> > 
> > What does this gain over passing a filename around? (NB. I'm not
> > claiming that's an entirely safe model either, but it's already
> > possible).
> 
> You don't need the executable image inside the chroot.

I don't believe that's intended to be possible, and if it is, I'm not
sure it's a gain.

-- 
3072D/F3A66B3A Julian Yon (2012 General Use) <pgp.2012%jry.me@localhost>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index