tech-security archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH] fexecve

> The problem is that there is a great deal of existing code in the
> world which receives file descriptors and which is not designed with
> the possibility that they might then be used to exec.

Then those programs won't be calling fexecve() at all, with any
descriptor, so how does it make the slightest bit of difference to them
what fexecve() does?

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML      
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index