tech-security archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: [PATCH] fexecve
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:18:04PM -0600, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
>
> Well setuid executables seem like a special case, but other than that, I
> think I can probably manage to execute something without an exec call.
> In fact I know I can, just by linking against any dynamic library and
> calling one of the functions in it.
You can't load a dynamic library that's on a filesystem mounted noexec.
Thor
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index