tech-security archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH] fexecve

>> It always could, just not with exec()-family calls.  Did you read
>> the points you didn't quote about script interpreters and VMs?
> What script interpreters?  What VMs?  Why would I include one in such
> an environment?

Why would you include a call to fexecve()?  You need cooperation from
the chrooted process either way.

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML      
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index