[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ssss and random(3)
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 02:19:44AM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> seems to use random(3).
> iirc ssss depends on cryptographically strong random numbers and
> random(3) is not suitable for the purpose.
Interesting, thanks for the observation - I do have a C implementation
of Blum Blum Shub which I was planning on adding RSN. I just need to
clean it up, and commit it.
Thanks once again,
Main Index |
Thread Index |