[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: openssl speed
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:12:56 +0100
comfooc <comfooc%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2008 12:59 AM, Tobias Nygren <tnn%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> > Here's a comparison of openssl in base versus openssl in pkgsrc.
> > (hmm, is the one in base built with -DAES_ASM?)
> OpenSSL was out of the box.
> Nice improvement:
> > aes-128 cbc 19817.54k 32046.81k 35250.21k
> > 34628.52k 34475.44k aes-128 cbc 29900.87k 63051.02k
> > 75165.91k 74338.22k 78229.52k
> So shouldn't it be added some performance boosting options to base
> openssl build?
> If not, why?
NetBSD has decided -- probably correctly -- that Perl should not be
part of the base system. OpenSSL is, and if it can't be built in
some mode without Perl the base system has to do without that option.
The question is what we can or should do about it in this case.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Main Index |
Thread Index |