tech-security archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: enforcing RLIMIT_NPROC in setuid() ?

On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:43:57PM -0500, Ed Ravin wrote:
> Would it make sense to have setuid() check the process limit,
> and return an error if the user in question is over the limit?

Yes and no. The problem is that it changes the way the Unix security
model works. When Linux started to do that, they created a nice number
of root exploitable issues, because processes could not drop the setuid
and never checked for it. Isn't the check good enough if the limit gets
inherited and the process is still counted against the real uid?


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index