Subject: Re: nfs optimization and veriexec
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
From: Elad Efrat <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/12/2007 13:30:52
YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> i don't think the veriexec scope is a good idea in general
> or an acceptable solution for my specific case.
That's a different discussion... basically, Veriexec's pseudo
device provides services like loading, unloading, querying,
flushing, etc., and may support a few more in the future.
The idea is to be able to describe each action specifically
rather than a global "can control Veriexec" or "can't", at least
in the kauth(9) layer.
> can you explain why you want to make it veriexec specific?
Why I want to make what Veriexec specific? the scope? because
it collects actions relevant only for Veriexec.