I have a small concern about how we're adding all of these special  
auth request types for optional parts of the kernel.  What are LKM  
providers supposed to do if they want to support some random security  
model (presumably 4.4BSD's for now)?

On Oct 20, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Elad Efrat wrote:

>
> Module Name:	src
> Committed By:	elad
> Date:		Fri Oct 20 22:02:54 UTC 2006
>
> Modified Files:
> 	src/share/examples/secmodel: secmodel_example.c
> 	src/share/man/man9: kauth.9
> 	src/sys/secmodel/bsd44: secmodel_bsd44_suser.c
> 	src/sys/sys: kauth.h
>
> Log Message:
> Add a new ALTQ kauth(9) request, KAUTH_REQ_NETWORK_ALTQ_JOBS.
>
>
> To generate a diff of this commit:
> cvs rdiff -r1.2 -r1.3 src/share/examples/secmodel/secmodel_example.c
> cvs rdiff -r1.20 -r1.21 src/share/man/man9/kauth.9
> cvs rdiff -r1.9 -r1.10 src/sys/secmodel/bsd44/secmodel_bsd44_suser.c
> cvs rdiff -r1.12 -r1.13 src/sys/sys/kauth.h
>
> Please note that diffs are not public domain; they are subject to the
> copyright notices on the relevant files.

-- thorpej