Subject: Re: Upcoming security model abstraction
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-security
Date: 09/03/2006 17:15:26
Hubert Feyrer wrote:

> secmodel/sm_bsd44_foo.c ?
> Or put the security models into src/sys/kern/secmodel_bsd44_* ?

Personally, I think '<model>_<function>.c' is elaborate enough.

Consider 'bsd44_suser.c' or 'bsd44_securelevel.c' - should make it
clear what these are; if this is still too 'vague' (and seriously,
take a moment to think where this is really effective), I'll go for
'secmodel_<model>_<function>.c'.

-e.

-- 
Elad Efrat