On 8/29/06, Elad Efrat <elad@netbsd.org> wrote:
> And why is SELinux required for the above?

Did I say SELinux was required?

I was explaining how a SELinux policy can be shared and still be useful.

> Like in systrace? (see 'systrace -A' too)

Systrace has similar capabilities.

I've heard the code is not very polished or actively maintained, but I have
not looked for myself.  It seems to work without any problems on my
OpenBSD ports, but I'm not certain exactly how it is configured at the
present.
-- 
"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate."
Unix "guru" for rent or hire -><- http://www.lightconsulting.com/~travis/
GPG fingerprint: 9D3F 395A DAC5 5CCC 9066  151D 0A6B 4098 0C55 1484