Subject: Re: Integrating securelevel and kauth(9)
To: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: Matt Thomas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/27/2006 17:37:02
Elad Efrat wrote:
> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
>> yes, let's wait for more opinions.
> That won't be necessary. Apparently, someone on this list (who contacted
> me off list) find my "tone of voice" inappropriate. This is just, way,
> way, way more than I can take. Sorry.
> Proposal withdrawn.
"Don't let the bastards get you down."
I think what you are doing is important. Kauth is a providing a framework
for implementing a policy but not the policy itself. If someone wants
functionality like securelevel, they should implement a securelevel listener
that provides it.
So provide the framework, and let others provide the policy.
Matt Thomas email: email@example.com
3am Software Foundry www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.