Elad Efrat wrote:
> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> 
>> yes, let's wait for more opinions.
> 
> That won't be necessary. Apparently, someone on this list (who contacted
> me off list) find my "tone of voice" inappropriate. This is just, way,
> way, way more than I can take. Sorry.
> 
> Proposal withdrawn.

"Don't let the bastards get you down."

I think what you are doing is important.  Kauth is a providing a framework
for implementing a policy but not the policy itself.  If someone wants
functionality like securelevel, they should implement a securelevel listener
that provides it.

So provide the framework, and let others provide the policy.
-- 
Matt Thomas                     email: matt@3am-software.com
3am Software Foundry              www: http://3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA              disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message.