> > i don't understand why it belongs to "security" node.
> > after all, "security" is not a subsystem.
> 
> set-id processes dont dump core due to security reasons, so i thought
> that putting this under the security node would be a good idea.
> 
> of course i'm not going to even bother arguing over this matter, and
> if that's where people want it to be, it's fine with me.

collecting security related knobs under the node sounds a bad idea to me.

YAMAMOTO Takashi