Subject: Re: sysctl knob to let sugid processes dump core (pr 15994)
To: None <>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <>
List: tech-security
Date: 01/24/2006 05:38:10
> > as commented, security_xxx shouldn't be in sysctl.h.
> do you have a suggestion of where to put it? do we have justification
> for sys/security.h? (or...?)

somewhere near defcorename, maybe?

i don't understand why it belongs to "security" node.
after all, "security" is not a subsystem.