Subject: Re: sysctl knob to let sugid processes dump core (pr 15994)
To: None <>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <>
List: tech-security
Date: 01/24/2006 05:23:34
> > again, why do you want this constant?
> unintentional leftovers. what do you think about the rest of the patch?

as commented, security_xxx shouldn't be in sysctl.h.

no opinions about the functionality itself.