Subject: Re: sysctl knob to let sugid processes dump core (pr 15994) To: None <elad@NetBSD.org> From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com> List: tech-security Date: 01/24/2006 05:23:34
> > again, why do you want this constant?
> unintentional leftovers. what do you think about the rest of the patch?
as commented, security_xxx shouldn't be in sysctl.h.
no opinions about the functionality itself.