Subject: Re: differences between pf and upstream?
To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net>
From: Jeff Rizzo <riz@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-security
Date: 01/07/2006 17:54:23
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig456885F70E3E9BF4947BD6D1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2005.12.30 16:59:40 -0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> | Do we have any list of differences between pf and OpenBSD's pf?
> |=20
> | Or does it all work and behave the same (at least up to last version =

> | imported)?
>
> I think everything should work the same except ALTQ
> functionality. But, someone correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> | Also, does NetBSD provide any pf documentation (or just the man pages=
)?
>
> Only the man pages AFAIK.
>
> 		-- Rui Paulo
>  =20

Actually, from what I could tell by glancing at the code, I don't think
pfsync functionality is supported, either.   (I'd be happy to be wrong
about this)

+j



--------------enig456885F70E3E9BF4947BD6D1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBQ8Bw1LOuUtxCgar5AQPhBwP7B6mSiCSm42fq8WWL2i6+sisDmyjge/NQ
xdw++k/0z5mhIqlo1AHzW3rzOKQUFwqaf5inZ9HBMTGyLXKLA/e+OZ17GYj+5xqx
b2NoywaGNHc5aLj8V4SZsXDZ89STL7Gwjz4RElXMxqDtu1NMVb1ex2Lrad+c0ycZ
qGGzNAcyUTY=
=wuzy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig456885F70E3E9BF4947BD6D1--