Subject: Re: Importing PaX features to NetBSD
To: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: Martin Husemann <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/18/2005 13:03:02
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:27:09AM -0600, James Chacon wrote:
> Things need to fit into a cross
> architecture framework that don't negatively impact other archs.
The mprotect changes are arch dependend, and as gimpy pointed out would
violate ABI on some archs. I don't see how implementing them (which would
be MD anyway) would cause any negative impact on other archs.
If some archs can not do it, fine (as Elad mentioned, we do the same for
non-executable stack already).