Subject: Re: etc/kerberosV unneeded?
To: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Love_H=F6rnquist_=C5strand?= <lha@kth.se>
List: tech-security
Date: 09/14/2005 16:54:00
--=-=-=


"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:

> Our krb5.conf goes in /etc, not into /etc/kerberosV/.
>
> Does the /etc/kerberosV directory serve any purpose? Should we delete
> it from the standard mtree?
>
> (Also, does /etc/kerberosIV still serve any purpose at this point?)

KerberosIV will go with next import of Heimdal. I think KerberosV should be
removed too, the code will still check for it for compatiblity reasons
though.

Love


--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUAQyg5ido1gLFKFEjAAQJD3wf9Fx90op3x+8Aj/gvCrwWHmQmliDxWm+5T
plM0QiRkw61Z1fRDl0zwADSo0JKDhnz6KsP7/uMhc+4Zo8FYX/vRvDTEhT+xnM4P
oXao1GS23dtEmaA7sYL82jHR82bPMiDCtMnaIm+O3SPkQsVHcVFIa5WkC0Z8vYSp
KvhKVkUpOeO+lnO0Tu1r0GxZEHXvMUr4zJ3thAC1WWXLXOmv/E/K1NQkAtVqpqeH
NQupbewIrV1nePCJTFvUq/Q0kA6fVARiyCuRUJhJU0ioRvvnNQMJ/HVuK8YyKiWj
gsfnDyBEL0TU43BB00UHqWIu6bvcFC9UZfR6Zt31f9hyyn91HI2AWg==
=0Dec
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--