Subject: Duplicate RMD160 implementations
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Elad Efrat <elad@NetBSD.org>
Date: 08/22/2005 22:55:23
It looks like we have at least two duplicate RMD160 implementations:
The first one, used in userland, is by Antoon Bosselaers. The second
one, used in the kernel and imported from OpenBSD, is by Markus Friedl.
Is there a reason behind it? If not (which I'm sure there isn't; OpenBSD
is using the same one in both places) is it okay if I use our kernel
RMD160 implementation in userland as well?
PGP Key ID: 0x666EB914