Subject: Re: bpg request for comments
To: Curt Sampson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Steven M. Bellovin <email@example.com>
Date: 07/21/2005 22:08:55
In message <Pine.NEB.firstname.lastname@example.org>, Curt Sampson w
>On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>> First, I suspect that there's some necessity to keep the (seriously
>> ugly) gpg command line interface.
>Why do you think so? I have a couple of thoughts on the matter.
You give good reasons for most of my statement -- that we really need a
better interface. My concern is the programmatic interface. At least
two packages I rely on -- exmh and psi -- understand the gpg interface.
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb