Subject: Re: Preventative security features?
To: Tim Kelly <email@example.com>
From: Brett Lymn <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/15/2004 11:41:16
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 07:47:13PM -0500, Tim Kelly wrote:
> OK. I offered a possible preventative security feature. You've shown
> reason to discard the the suggestion. I am actually conceding that this
> suggestion is not implementable,
Well done! It's rare to see someone do this.
> not for obvious reasons, i.e., there's
> something wrong with my suggestion, but because as others have already
> communicated to me offline it will be impossible to get anyone to agree
> to reasonable partitioning themes (even if one is the very partitioning
> scheme you use).
Yep - it's a lot like what shell you use :) One size does not fit all.
> Now it is your turn to offer a possible preventative security feature.