Subject: Re: kern.showallprocs implementation
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/28/2004 15:33:15
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 11:01:23AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > The diff is in attachment, although I'm not really sure if `cvs diff` i=
> > best way to submit diff's to the mailing list.
> "cvs diff -u" is far more readable.
> > What do you guys think ? Is it ok ?
> No idea - i guess it can't hurt to have it, but with standard Unix
> semantics by default, i.e. show all users' processes.
True, but there are a number of situations where something like this is=20
very useful. Consider a computing facility whose customers are in=20
competition with each other. In those cases, keeping users from seeing=20
other processes is a very good thing. For instance the Airbus engineers=20
might not want the Boeing engineers to see what simulations they are=20
As for normal Unix behavior, my understanding is that the default will be=
to show everything. :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----