Subject: Re: systrace features?
To: Charles Blundell <>
From: Daniel Carosone <>
List: tech-security
Date: 09/24/2003 10:56:53
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:40:03PM +0100, Charles Blundell wrote:
> I have written the code for two extra options to systrace that I
> think will help when systrace comes across less than usual situations.

I think they're great ideas, especially the former.  Would the
latter be more usefully/generally handled by a new action type,
say "kill" or "terminate" - or even "signal" with an argument?