Subject: Re: verified executable kernel modification committed
To: Brett Lymn <>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <>
List: tech-security
Date: 10/29/2002 20:17:11
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:41:08AM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:05:25AM +1100, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> > 
> > At a minimum, the control program (and associated examples) should be
> > "veriexecctl" or something like that (instead of "verifiedexec_load").
> > As for the kernel option name, that's probably OK.
> > 
> Sure, sounds good to me.  I thought that verifiedexec_load was a bit
> of a mouthful.

I don't find "veriexecctl" much better, frankly.  It's still hugely long
and will force ls output into a smaller number of columns, which is
annoying.  Please pick a more Unixy name.

 Thor Lancelot Simon	                            
   But as he knew no bad language, he had called him all the names of common
 objects that he could think of, and had screamed: "You lamp!  You towel!  You
 plate!" and so on.              --Sigmund Freud