Subject: Re: what's in a name? fingerprinted exec
To: Brett Lymn <>
From: Daniel Carosone <>
List: tech-security
Date: 10/17/2002 08:24:33
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:04:03PM +0930, Brett Lymn wrote:
> Someone else was thinking about pursuing this, it does provide some
> other capabilities but has it's own downsides - you cannot apply the
> scheme to a shell script.

I don't see why, it's just a matter of finding a method of attaching
the signature in the file that is compatible with existing parsers.
A sigblock in shell comments at the end seems fine to me.