>> >From download-vulnerability-list:
>> New vulnerability list (15224 bytes) is smaller than existing list (15232
>> bytes)
>> 
>> Was something removed intentionally, or is this bad?
>
>The bind-9.2.1 vulnerability line was removed, since bind-9.2.1 is not
>vulnerable IIUC. Normally, the file size should be increased anyway,
>but this seems to have been overlooked this time.

	maybe i should have commented out the line instead?  sorry for
	confusion.

itojun