Subject: Re: arc4random(9)
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org, tech-security@netbsd.org>
From: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
List: tech-security
Date: 05/29/2002 07:20:29 
>	if you prefer to see arc4random(9) as a wrapper against /dev/urandom,
>	like below, i'm okay with it.  but i think the following wrapper
>	is wrose than arc4random(9) in the current tree, specifically
>	under entropy-starved situation.

	or, call this wrapper random() and retire truely-crappy random()
	in the kernel.

itojun