Subject: Re: What to do about unfixed vulnerabilities?
To: Matthew Orgass <darkstar@pgh.net>
From: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
List: tech-security
Date: 10/23/2000 20:10:17
  by mail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 24 Oct 2000 00:10:26 -0000
	by noc.untraceable.net (8.11.1/8.11.1/bonk!) id e9O0AHJ18205;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 20:10:17 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 20:10:17 -0400
From: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
To: Matthew Orgass <darkstar@pgh.net>
Cc: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>, tech-pkg@netbsd.org,
   tech-security@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: What to do about unfixed vulnerabilities?
Message-ID: <20001023201016.A18170@noc.untraceable.net>
Reply-To: Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net>
References: <20001023190349.614DF35DC2@smb.research.att.com> <Pine.BSI.3.96.1001023192246.18894A-100000@doit.pgh.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.96.1001023192246.18894A-100000@doit.pgh.net>; from darkstar@pgh.net on Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 07:57:30PM -0400
Return-Receipt-To: receipts@daemon.org

>  I'll confess that I'm writing this from pine, not having had the chance
>to review alternatives yet.  Does anyone know of a mail client that is
>close in feel to pine to refer those of us who like pine but don't really
>want to give the world a key to our system? 

i'm led to believe (by the presence of .../mutt-1.2.5/contrib/Pine.rc)
that you can get mutt to behave in a rather pine-like manner, although
i'll not admit to ever having tried it.  i like mutt just fine, and
i've never used pine.  okay...maybe four times.

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."