Subject: Re: What to do about unfixed vulnerabilities?
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
From: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>
List: tech-security
Date: 10/23/2000 14:54:41
  by mail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2000 18:54:47 -0000
	by blues.jpj.net (right/backatcha) with ESMTP id e9NIsf308977;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:54:41 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:54:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>
To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
cc: Paul Hoffman <phoffman@proper.com>, tech-pkg@netbsd.org,
   tech-security@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: What to do about unfixed vulnerabilities?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010232038100.2541-100000@rfhpc8320.fh-regensburg.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0010231447310.7996-100000@blues.jpj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hubert Feyrer wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> > I notice this in FreeBSD's ports/mail/pine4/Makefile,v:
> <deleted>
> 
> That's nice. We're NetBSD. Pleased to meet you! :-)

The remark pertains to the PINE distfile.  If UW magically sends different
sources when NetBSD users download PINE, then it makes sense that you
dismiss the remark.  Otherwise, it does not.
-- 
Trevor Johnson
http://jpj.net/~trevor/gpgkey.txt