by mail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2000 11:05:29 -0000
	by coconut.itojun.org (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W) with ESMTP id UAA05512;
	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 20:05:21 +0900 (JST)
To: hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de
cc: tech-x11@netbsd.org, tech-security@netbsd.org
In-reply-to: feyrer's message of Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:04:04 +0200.
      <Pine.GSO.4.10.10007211302040.11355-100000@rfhpc8320.fh-regensburg.de>
Subject: Re: Weekly BSD Security Digest 2000/07/10 to 2000/07/16
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 20:05:21 +0900
Message-ID: <5510.964177521@coconut.itojun.org>


>> 	unfortunately, i think so.
>> 	we'll need to put fixes into, i've looked into xfree86.org
>> 	ftp server and found no patch for them when i checked.  sorry that
>> 	i did not report my (rather unfortunate) experience sooner.
>Maybe we can use the OpenBSD patches? 
>ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/2.7/common/021_X11_libs.patch

	not sure, i'm no X11 expert...

itojun