Subject: Re: Weekly BSD Security Digest 2000/07/10 to 2000/07/16
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-security
Date: 07/21/2000 13:04:04
  by mail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2000 11:04:09 -0000
	by rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e6LB3H313417;
	Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:03:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 13:04:04 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
Reply-To: hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de
To: itojun@iijlab.net
cc: tech-x11@netbsd.org, tech-security@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: Weekly BSD Security Digest 2000/07/10 to 2000/07/16
In-Reply-To: <1919.964155569@coconut.itojun.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10007211302040.11355-100000@rfhpc8320.fh-regensburg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 21 Jul 2000 itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
> 	unfortunately, i think so.
> 	we'll need to put fixes into, i've looked into xfree86.org
> 	ftp server and found no patch for them when i checked.  sorry that
> 	i did not report my (rather unfortunate) experience sooner.

Maybe we can use the OpenBSD patches? 
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/2.7/common/021_X11_libs.patch


 - Hubert

-- 
NetBSD - because Unix isn't just #include <linux.h>, i386, ILP32, ELF, ...!