Subject: Re: evil? sshd patch
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-security
Date: 11/03/1999 18:36:17
  by redmail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 1999 17:36:33 -0000
	by rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA03394;
	Wed, 3 Nov 1999 18:36:18 +0100 (MET)
	by rfhs8036.fh-regensburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA14214;
	Wed, 3 Nov 1999 18:36:18 +0100 (MET)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 18:36:17 +0100 (MET)
From: Hubert Feyrer <feyrer@rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de>
Reply-To: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
cc: tech-security@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: evil? sshd patch
In-Reply-To: <199911031730.MAA15846@Twig.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9911031835580.13112-100000@rfhs8036>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, der Mouse wrote:
> I'd still rather see this specified in sshd_config (including the magic
> user's name), disabled by default.

If it has to go in, then yes, that way, please. :)


 -  Hubert

-- 
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra