Subject: Re: what to put into cryptosrc-intl tree
To: Aidan Cully <email@example.com>
From: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/24/1999 09:54:42
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Aidan Cully wrote:
: > > And *people use it, dammit.* :)
: > I agree with this. People use kerb IV. Even if we think it's not as tough
: > as we'd like, people still use it. As such, we should support it.
: Supported, yes, but should it be imported or made a pkg?
The more possibilities we have, the more we need to look at dynamically
loading things like krb4/5 and ssl `modules', since these affect some fairly
`standard' system tools (telnet, rlogin, telnetd, ...).
Come to think of it, a way to dynamically load a SOCKS client module would
be nice too. ;)
-- Todd Vierling (email@example.com)