Subject: Re: what to put into cryptosrc-intl tree
To: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/23/1999 12:46:40
On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Todd Vierling wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> : > > 4. kerberos IV (eBones)
> : >
> : > I oppose this. No new code using DES. DES is not good enough for our
> : > source tree.
?? When did we gain crypto strength requirements?
> : This is not really new code; this functionality already exists in
> : domestic/cryptsrc-us.
> And *people use it, dammit.* :)
I agree with this. People use kerb IV. Even if we think it's not as tough
as we'd like, people still use it. As such, we should support it.