Subject: Re: what to put into cryptosrc-intl tree
To: Michael C. Richardson <>
From: Perry E. Metzger <>
List: tech-security
Date: 06/23/1999 12:59:13
"Michael C. Richardson" <> writes:
> 2. we import KAME IPsec. It appears that there is movement towards using
> 	KAME as a route toward unified ipv6, and there is desire to do
> 	this for 1.5. 

I suggest you let Itojun do the work on this. He's already outside the 

The only parts that need to be put into cryptosrc-intl will be the ESP 
stuff, since the rest is exportable.

> 4. kerberos IV (eBones)

I oppose this. No new code using DES. DES is not good enough for our
source tree.