Subject: Re: what to put into cryptosrc-intl tree
To: Michael C. Richardson <email@example.com>
From: Perry E. Metzger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/23/1999 12:59:13
"Michael C. Richardson" <email@example.com> writes:
> 2. we import KAME IPsec. It appears that there is movement towards using
> KAME as a route toward unified ipv6, and there is desire to do
> this for 1.5.
I suggest you let Itojun do the work on this. He's already outside the
The only parts that need to be put into cryptosrc-intl will be the ESP
stuff, since the rest is exportable.
> 4. kerberos IV (eBones)
I oppose this. No new code using DES. DES is not good enough for our