In some mail I received from Darren Reed, sie wrote
> 
> In some mail I received from Mike Long, sie wrote
> [...]
> > I think a far simpler, and hence better, solution would be to have
> > init run a separate /etc/rc.secure script after increasing the
> > securelevel.
[...]
> > Comments?
> 
> I've seen other comments on this thread mention the former and I think it
> (and that name) is a workable solution which I hope everyone finds suitable
> for NetBSD.

I just realised that "rc.secure" is meaningless if you use kernels with
securelevel == -1.  Maybe "rc.multiuser" is a better (and more obvious)
name ?

Also, sendmail, portmapper and all NFS stuff should be moved to this file.

Darren