In message <200602201225.k1KCPgvi006299@guild.plethora.net>, Peter Seebach writ
es:
>In message <20060220121657.GC8924@drowsy.duskware.de>, Martin Husemann writes:
>>On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 06:10:21AM -0600, Peter Seebach wrote:
>>> I guess you could make a case for expressing it as part of machdep.c, but even
>>> then it's not quite a good match.
>>
>>Yeah. Have you looked at __PCI_BUS_DEVORDER?
>
>Hmm.  That might actually do what I need, although the interface seems a
>little barer-metal than I'd like.  :)

Nope!  Won't do what I need, because not all the devices in question are on
a PCI bus!

We really need a generic way to say "configure this after that".

-s