Subject: Re: Assming char == signed char?
To: None <tech-ports@NetBSD.ORG>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Collatz.McRCIM.McGill.EDU>
Date: 06/19/1995 11:44:25
>> As an aside is the correct fix:
>> (signed char)tty->a_member_of_type_char == -1
> This is not a desirable fix, because it assumes that one has access
> to an ansi compiler.
Under what circumstances can this be untrue, seeing as how NetBSD ships
with a version of gcc? It's a mildly old gcc, true, but not so old it
doesn't understand "signed char".