re: Fixing configure failures from newer gcc

[matthew green <mrg%eterna23.net@localhost>]

you still don't understand what i'm saying.

code that has been building with -std=c99 or newer has never
*failed to compile* until gcc 14, and a lot of that code does
rely upon newer C standards.  you can either *fix the code*
or turn the errors back to warnings or nothing...

it's not enough to try to force everyone to c89.

the best solution, imo, is to fix the code, but we all have
priorities that matter and i'm not fixing eg, tinyfugue's
method of testing for symbols.


.mrg.