Re: lang/rust on aarch64eb

[John Klos <john%klos.com@localhost>]

> > I don't understand Rust at all. "Unexpected rustc version" is an
> > error?
>
> Yep.  They only guarantee "one version backward compatibility for
> building rust itself", primarily due to the rather flud state of
> the language itself.  That means that you must have 1.78.x or a
> binary of 1.79 to build 1.79.0 from source.

I can't even tell the difference between what Rust might consider a 
warning and what it might consider an error :P

> Welcome to the insane asylum! :)

I don't NEED to run Rust on aarch64eb, but it'd be nice to be able to 
build pkgsrc packages that require Rust. I suppose if someone really wants 
it, they can take the time to make the snake eat itself.

Thanks!
John