tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: two baffling bulk build failures
> Am 25.08.2024 um 19:18 schrieb Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>:
>
> I have been seeing bulk failures for two packages I maintain (neither of
> which has changed lately, not that lack of change means much). Both
> build fine for me (not in pbulk).
>
> * ups-nut-cgi and raqm
>
> http://shadow.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/reports/HEAD/NetBSD-10.0-i386/20240824.2109/meta/report.html
> http://shadow.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/reports/HEAD/NetBSD-10.0-i386/20240824.2109/ups-nut-cgi-2.8.2nb1/build.log
> has a complaint about -lraqm.
I saw some other build failure on amd64, also about raqm. But I couldn’t figure it out.
>
> * net/syncthing
>
> http://shadow.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/reports/HEAD/NetBSD-10.0-i386/20240824.2109/syncthing-1.26.1nb7/build.log:
You missed the actual build failure, which is unfortunately in the middle of the build log:
# github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v3/disk
vendor/github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v3/disk/disk_netbsd.go:45:13: undefined: sizeOfStatvfs
vendor/github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v3/disk/disk_netbsd.go:46:16: undefined: Statvfs
vendor/github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v3/disk/disk_netbsd.go:105:10: undefined: Statvfs
vendor/github.com/shirou/gopsutil/v3/disk/disk_netbsd.go:142:21: undefined: Statvfs
Looking at https://github.com/shirou/gopsutil/tree/v3.24.5/disk, I see specializations for NetBSD arm64 and amd64 but not 32-bit platforms.
This would be easy to add, though the current version of the package is v4.
—
Benny
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index