tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: rust update proposal
On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 07:33:32AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> nia <nia%NetBSD.org@localhost> writes:
>
> > Does the current version work on any 32-bit platform?
> > It's failing in all the bulk builds, including armv7
>
> >From ftp.netbsd.org:
>
> packages/NetBSD/x86_64/10.0_2024Q2/All/rust-1.76.0nb3.tgz
> packages/NetBSD/x86_64/9.0_2024Q2/All/rust-1.76.0nb3.tgz
> packages/NetBSD/i386/10.0_2024Q2/All/rust-1.76.0nb3.tgz
> packages/NetBSD/i386/9.0_2024Q2/All/rust-1.76.0nb3.tgz
>
> There have been failures to build on armv7, which have felt to me like
> not having the required gigabytes of ram, while rust-bin-x has been ok.
The build host is aarch64. Do you mean address space?
Both "exit status 101":
http://victory.netbsd.org/pkgsrc/packages/reports/2024Q2/evbarm7-10.0/20240705.0101/rust-1.76.0nb3/build.log
http://victory.netbsd.org/pkgsrc/packages/reports/2024Q2/i386-10.0/20240705.1854/rust-1.76.0nb3/build.log
Maybe we should use the C versions of libraries on all 32-bit
platforms?
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index