tech-pkg archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Overhauling gcc.mk
Looks good to me, thanks for working on this.
Is removing the check for specific NetBSD versions "ok"?
Will the appropriate -libs package be automatically depended
on if a newer gcc package is pulled in to compile something
and USE_PKGSRC_GCC isn't set?
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:13:29PM +0100, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> As promised, I've been completely renovating mk/compiler/gcc.mk to hopefully
> reduce a lot of the complexity, make it less likely that future changes will
> result in accidental breakage, add numerous comments, as well as improving
> performance.
>
> The branch is here:
>
> https://github.com/NetBSD/pkgsrc/compare/trunk...TritonDataCenter:pkgsrc:feature/gcc-selection/trunk
>
> Overview:
>
> * Move GCC_REQD and associated logic into a separate file.
>
> * If the user has requested USE_NATIVE_GCC=yes then skip all of the
> GCC_REQD processing.
>
> * Add support for GCC_BOOTSTRAP_PKGS, a list of PKGPATH packages that
> are in the dependency path for gcc and gcc-libs, making it easier
> for users to avoid circular dependencies when USE_PKGSRC_GCC=yes.
>
> * Make it easier for users to select their own GCC packages, e.g.
> from wip or other repositories.
>
> * Remove _USE_GCC_SHLIB and USE_GCC_RUNTIME, and simply enable based
> on USE_PKGSRC_GCC_RUNTIME, with the same exclusions as above.
> Removing USE_GCC_RUNTIME from individual packages can be done later.
>
> * Remove ALLOW_NEWER_COMPILER, it essentially duplicates the
> USE_NATIVE_GCC logic and confuses things.
>
> * Remove bogus _LANGUAGES setup, assume GCC packages support all
> languages, and simplify.
>
> * Simplify GCC version detection, reducing number of forks, and remove
> support for long-obsolete compilers.
>
> * Simplify NetBSD USE_PKGSRC_GCC_RUNTIME selection.
>
> * Rename a bunch of variables to make it clearer what they actually
> do.
>
> * Use newer make syntax.
>
> * Stop trying to support NetBSD < 1.5.
>
> This will obviously require lots of testing before it even goes near the
> tree, but I would appreciate feedback on any of the more contentious parts,
> and obviously testing would be fantastic too.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jonathan Perkin - mnx.io - pkgsrc.smartos.org
> Open Source Complete Cloud www.tritondatacenter.com
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index