Re: Adding mk/ssl.buildlink3.mk

[David Holland <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 09:46:14AM +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
 > Would anyone object to me making a pass through the tree to replace
 > 
 > .include "../../security/openssl/buildlink3.mk"
 > 
 > with
 > 
 > .include "../../mk/ssl.buildlink3.mk"
 > 
 > and adding a simple mk/ssl.buildlink3.mk which just includes
 > security/openssl/buildlink3.mk

It is supposed to also allow switching in other SSL implementations
(which are mostly not api-compatible, so i'm guessing not...)?

If not, can you call it openssl.mk instead of ssl.mk to avoid confusion?

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost