Re: MAKE_JOBS.devel/cmake ineffective

[Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost>]

* On 2020-11-04 at 13:44 GMT, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 12:18:19PM +0000, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> > To me this makes more sense, and is easier to read and understand
> > rather than embedding the "-j".  The one difference is that now -j1
> > will be explicitly used when MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=no, where previously the
> > -j was omitted, but again to me that feels more correct anyway.
> 
> At least for bmake it makes a huge difference and not necessarily in the
> right direction. -j1 and no -j are quite different modes.

Understood, thanks.

I've updated the diff to revert back to the previous behaviour, and
also added some more documentation and _VARS support.

-- 
Jonathan Perkin  -  Joyent, Inc.  -  www.joyent.com